Conservative Justices Question Insurance Mandate
WASHINGTON (AP) - Today's historic Supreme Court arguments on health care reform suggest that the court may be ready to strike down the provision requiring Americans to buy insurance or pay a penalty.
Justice Anthony Kennedy suggested the mandate "is a step beyond" what would be allowed under earlier Supreme Court cases. He also said that allowing the mandate would "change the relationship" between the government and U.S. citizens. But at another point, he acknowledged the complexity of paying for America's health care needs.
He and Chief Justice John Roberts appear to be the pivotal votes in the decision. And during today's arguments, Roberts wondered aloud what Americans might be required to purchase next, if they can be required to buy health insurance.
The court's four Democratic appointees appeared ready to uphold the requirement.
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said she found the debate over health care similar to the debate from years ago about the Social Security retirement system. She asked how Congress could be able to compel workers to pay into Social Security, but not have the same ability to address health care.
Attorney Paul Clement (kleh-MENT'), representing Florida and 25 other states challenging the law, acknowledged that a system of national health insurance might well be constitutional.
- Justices Take Up Heart of Health Care Overhaul Law
- Supreme Court Justices Vote
- Supreme Court Justices To Appear At UF
- Former Supreme Court Justice Visits North Central Florida
- The Affordable Care Act: What You Need To Know
- UF Health Advance Directive Educating Others About End-Of-Life Care
- High Court Takes Up Fight Over Obama Health Law
- States Have Many Questions on Medicaid Expansion
- Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Hobby Lobby
- U.S. Supreme Court Strikes Down Key Section of Voting Rights Act