Florida man says sick cat excuses DUI, court says otherwise
TALLAHASSEE - No, taking your friend’s sick cat to the veterinarian does not get you off the hook for driving drunk.
That’s the message a state appeals court delivered to Hillsborough County’s Christopher Brooks Wednesday. He was arrested in 2010 for driving while intoxicated.
Brooks had been transporting his friend who owned a very sick cat to a veterinary clinic the night of his arrest. At his trial, he and his lawyers contended that should acquit his DUI.
Legally, this is called a defense of necessity. The defense, the court ruled, allows someone to drive drunk if the person reasonably believes it necessary “to avoid an imminent threat of danger or serious bodily injury to himself or others.”
“We do not interpret the phrase ‘or others’ as applying to animals,” ruled a three-judge panel of the 2nd District Court of Appeals.
A necessity defense only applies to drunk driving if there are no “reasonable alternatives…to address a claimed emergency,” according to the ruling.
The court did say that Brooks’ “wish to obtain treatment for the ailing feline is understandable.” When police pulled Brooks over, the cat’s owner informed the officer his cat was “fixin’ to die,” which it did a few hours later.
- Appeals court hears case over kosher food in Florida prisons
- Florida Serial Killer Appeals to US Supreme Court
- Man Arrested On Charges of DUI, Assaulting an Officer
- Man charged with DUI, 2 people killed
- Court OKs Ruling Blocking Florida Cuba Contracts Law
- Florida Supreme Court Upholds State's Drug Law
- Florida Court of Appeals Rules Guns are Allowed on University Campuses
- US Appeals Court Weighs New Gulf Drilling Plans
- Appeals Court to Review Approval of BP Settlement
- Execution of Mass Killer Blocked by Federal Appeals Court